As it happens, I can’t fathom all the possibilities to account for the (probably false) data that Jesus died and then his tomb was found empty. My imagination does not stretch as far as those who have religious reasons not to accept the claim the Christians keep making, which of course the Jews and Muslims do. Following is a passage from a Muslim blogger called Paarsurrey:
“Jesus did not resurrect from the dead as he did not die on the cross in the first place; he was delivered from the Cross in near-dead position; he was treated for the injuries inflicted on him on the cross secretly by his friends in the tomb of Arimathea; when he got recovered that he could travel he left Judea and traveled to India along with his mother Mary.”
This is kind of like what I said earlier today, crucifixion has a survival rate. Or even, it is an elaborate chemically-induced hoax.
Above is a picture taken in Japan. Shingo, Aomori also claims to know what happened to Jesus: he fled aged 21, became a rice farmer and lived to be 106. This is according to the Gospel of Jesus, seized by the Japanese government.
All very compelling stuff. I currently look forward to knowing why a miracle is a more likely answer to the question of how the data–the life, death and resurrection–can be correct.